Robotics aims to develop manipulation skills approaching human performance. However, skill complexity is often over- or underestimated based on individual experience, and the real-world performance gap is difficult or expensive to measure through in-person competitions. To bridge this gap, we propose a compact, internet-connected, electronic task board to measure manipulation performance remotely; we call it the digital robot judge or “DR.J.” By detecting key events on the board through performance circuitry, DR.J provides an alternative to transporting equipment to in-person competitions and serves as a portable test and data generation system that captures and grades performances making comparisons less expensive. Data collected are automatically published on a web dashboard that provides a living performance benchmark that can visualize improvements in real-world manipulation skills of robot platforms over time across the globe. In this paper, we share the results of a proof-of-concept electronic task board with industry-inspired tasks used in an international competition in 2021 and 2022 to benchmark localization, insertion, and disassembly tasks. We present data from 10 DR.J task boards, a method to derive Relative Task Complexity (RTC) from timing data, and compare robot solutions with a human performer. In the best case, robots performed 9× faster than humans in specialized tasks but achieved only 16% of human speed across the full set of tasks. Finally, we present the modular design, instructions, and software to replicate the electronic task board or to adapt it to new use cases to promote task-centric benchmarking.
